Dcf Analysis Template

Wednesday, November 25th 2020. | Sample Templates

Dcf Analysis Template- fundamental analysis tools for investors in india tear sheet learn about tear sheets and their contents 10 powerful golden rules to write equity research report the excellent business valuation spreadsheet microsoft excel dcf model xlsx cost capital secrets to winning m&a project management excel discounted cash flow dcf analysis model with irr and discounted cash flow analysis stock pitch guidelines template [3no7m9xyr3ld] downloading a dcf model template
32df b961fc06a724dff
The excellent Business Valuation Spreadsheet Microsoft Excel, source:pinterest.com
cashflow 101 game sheets home cash flow spreadsheet excel bud 672x896
Excel Discounted Cash Flow Dcf Analysis Model With Irr And, source:golagoon.com
1 984
Business Valuation Excel Model with Economic Value Added, source:eloquens.com
0F FE0F 91C7 CDA018 image
Corporate Finance Institute NASBA Registry, source:nasbaregistry.org
discounted cash flow analysis advantages and disadvantages l
PPT Cash Accounting Accrual Accounting and Discounted, source:slideserve.com
Chapter 09 using discounted cash flow analysis to make investment decisions
Chapter 09 Using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis to Make, source:docplayer.net
Real Estate Interface
Real Estate Financial Modeling & REIT Financial Modeling, source:breakingintowallstreet.com
tear sheet
Tear Sheet Learn About Tear Sheets and Their Contents, source:corporatefinanceinstitute.com
bfe803b afba
Pin on Letter Formats, source:pinterest.com
Results udate report example 716x1024 1
10 Powerful Golden Rules To Write Equity Research Report, source:educba.com

Sample Example & Format Templates Free Excel, Doc, PDF, xls copy of dcf analysis template xls dcf analysis template dcf analysis templatexls chapter 09 using discounted cash flow analysis to make excel discounted cash flow dcf analysis model with irr and investor teaser template pin on letter formats real estate financial modeling & reit financial modeling ppt cash accounting accrual accounting and discounted corporate finance institute nasba registry financial modeling training series now wel e chapter 09 using discounted cash flow analysis to make business valuation excel model with economic value added
dcf model template download free excel template dcf model template this dcf model template provides you with a foundation to build your own discounted cash flow model with different assumptions below is a preview of the dcf model template download the free template free discounted cash flow templates the customizable template includes annual dcf analysis columns as well as sections to factor in valuation considerations assumptions in e statement balance sheet cash flow statement key financial ratios and tangible fixed assets — culminating in an auto generating financial overview chart discounted cash flow dcf excel template discounted cash flow dcf is a method used to estimate the value of an investment based on future cash flow the dcf formula allows you to determine the value of a pany today based on how much money it will likely generate at a future date 10 dcf model template in excel jun 12 2017 go to to download and reuse now a discounted cash flow model template in excel discounted cash flow valuation excel the spreadsheet page you can execute your own dcf valuation model by inserting some basic data into the template in this article we break down the entire procedure into simple steps to use the template you will need to replace data that is in blue with your own information contents of the template discounted cash flow dcf excel model for private equity description dcf analysis is a valuation method which uses future cash flow predictions to estimate investment return potential by discounting these projections to a present value approximation and using this to assess the attractiveness of the investment this 8 step dcf model template aims to help you calculate the value of a business discounted cash flow dcf analysis exhibit b – dcf template the following spreadsheet shows a concise way to build a "best practices" dcf model calculation of unlevered cash flow may be modified as warranted by your specific situation each of the steps required to conduct a dcf analysis are described in more detail in following sections stanford university to whoever reading this as a template please note that for each dcf that you do the breakdown of the line items on the financial statements will vary from pany to pany and ought to be customized accordingly please consult sec filings bloomberg or google yahoo finance to obtain financial statement data basic discounted cash flow model this video opens with an explanation of the objective of a discounted cash flow “dcf” model in dcf analysis essentially what you are doing is projecting the cash flows of a pany project or asset and determining the value of those future cash flows today dcf analysis is focused on the time value of money

A step by step Methodical method for efficient combined-Language IP Integration via Pankaj Singh (Infineon applied sciences) & Gaurav Kumar Verma (Mentor photographs) summary –The extensive diversity of design languages obtainable nowadays poses a significant barrier to IP reuse. SystemC, SystemVerilog, and conventional HDL languages have wonderful strengths which make them extra relevant for writing certain parts of a design or IP. Designers additionally commonly opt for a language according to their past adventure. This often leads to parts of designs written in distinctive languages being built-in in a single design. IP available from distinctive sources may additionally also are available in distinct flavors. Connecting such IP requires special abilities, when it comes to talents in all of the diverse languages concerned, which is not at all times easy to discover. The vast range of alternate options attainable to make these connections further increases the complexity of the issue. The above problem necessitates the need for a strategy that compares the different ways of creating combined-language connections (equivalent to direct instantiation, the SystemVerilog bind construct, SystemC manage/have a look at, SC Verification-connect, and SC-DPI) and defines their pros and cons, offering actual suggestions to help clients choose the top of the line approach for his or her particular SoC. in the past, many of the work was performed by EDA agencies to boost equipment that take note combined-language design for simulation but little or no has been done toward offering a finished methodology that highlights most beneficial practices, thereby minimize combined-language design integration considerations. only principal obtainable work written on blended language IP reuse [1] used direct instantiation and SystemVerilog bind strategies without offering solution/benefits of alternative alternate approaches or comparing both against each and every other. This paper appears at mixed-language design integration from both the EDA device developers’ and designers’ views. It describes distinctive tactics and offers constructive insights to help users select the optimal option for integrating two IP blocks in a combined-language atmosphere. we will give functional examples in keeping with true designs. The methodology presented in this paper is extra used to develop a utility that takes both areas, written in distinct languages, as enter and automates the hook-up connection method with the aid of suggesting the most correct approach. It also generates snippets of code that may also be instantly inserted in the design to make these connections seamless and less susceptible to the variety of error that may end up from manual updates. The paper incorporates a working prototype of this utility, highlighting productivity development results from real-world, blended-language design integrations. I. INTRODUCTION IP reuse has long been touted as one of the key elements in enabling construction of today’s complicated SoC designs. The concept of reuse looks standard and simple in theory, however there are a couple of barriers that design and verification groups ought to handle to be a hit, exceptionally within the case of business IP cores. one of the most huge limitations to IP reuse today is the wide variety of design languages utilized in IP. regularly designers are not privy to numerous mixed-language design integration alternate options. different instances the expertise on a considerable number of alternate options is attainable, however it is difficult for a consumer to opt for the optimum correct alternative according to their combined language design state of affairs. This issue in blended-language IP integration and reuse often ends up in discovering issues late all the way through the design cycle, which influences the general productivity. This paper offers a complete methodology that highlights the ultimate practices for blended-language design integration and automatically comes up with an option for designers to choose the most beneficial formula for integration. There are extensively 5 techniques of constructing mixed-language connections. pros and cons of each and every of these processes and their comparison is described when it comes to the usage eventualities, performance implications of the usage of one versus the different, delta cycle cost replace considerations, and extra. A step-by-step guideline in response to resolution-making trees that designers can comply with to aid them come to a decision which approach most accurately fits their specific blended-language integration scenario is also mentioned. The paper begins with details on quite a lot of options for connections of blended-language IP blocks, illustrating every method with a standard illustration. It also includes a summary of comparisons between diverse strategies. The third part elaborates on a step-via-step methodical approach for integration. The fourth and fifth sections cover the particulars about the utility that automates the IP integration. The closing section highlights the benefits of this methodology. II. the way to join blended-LANGUAGE IP BLOCKS during this part we can introduce every of the five strategies for making mixed-language connections and discuss their professionals and cons. A assessment of distinct methods will even be offered to help examine the choicest relevant IP reuse choice for a user in accordance with the design scenario. A. Direct Instantiation within the direct instantiation formula, an IP block written in any language is instantiated at once interior the goal IP block (written in any language) in the SoC. here the instantiation statement follows the syntax of the target IP block, as if the instantiated IP block became written within the identical language as the goal IP block. This system is the most commonly used for making combined-language connections because it presents seamless integration with the rest of the code. besides the fact that children, because of the character of its use-model, it requires that the source code of the goal IP block is attainable. This significantly limits the usability point of this in any other case effective system in real-world IP reuse cases. instance:Clock Generator IP Blockmodule clockgen # (parameter period = 5 …) (input duration, input lengthen, enter duty_cycle, output clk);…endmodule Instantiating Clock Generator IP Block internal VHDL Stimulus GeneratorclockgenInst: entity clkgenlib.clockgen port map(clk => clk); B. SystemVerilog Bind construct The SystemVerilog bind assemble provides an IP block access to each external ports and internal signals in the goal IP block. The chosen and goal IP blocks may also be written in any design language. This formula offers a powerful capability that, in conjunction with a in particular designed use-mannequin, can be used to with ease connect both IP blocks independent of their languages. The SystemVerilog bind construct is more and more fitting the preferred components for connecting IP blocks in SoC’s these days, because it presents hook-up connections between two IP blocks with out requiring their supply code to be existing. youngsters, blended-language the SystemVerilog bind construct has no longer been standardized yet, and as such, it isn’t wholly appropriate with all of the accessible simulators. What may additionally work with a simulator from one EDA vendor can not be assured to work with the simulator of one more EDA vendor. besides this dilemma, EDA providers additionally range of their use models. also, seeing that bind is a SystemVerilog assemble, it ought to be used simplest within the SystemVerilog regions of the SoC. as an instance, if a consumer wishes to connect a VHDL IP block with a SystemC IP block, an intermediate dummy SystemVerilog wrapper module will have to be created to use the bind assemble, which may also no longer be a very effective approach. These components a bit of avoid the usage of this otherwise effective formula of making connections. instance:Clock Generator IP Blockmodule ClockGen # (parameter duration = 5) (input output clk);…endprogram Binding Clock Generator IP Block to SystemC Stimulus Generatorbind StimGen ClockGen clockgenInst(.clk(clock)); C. SystemC handle/take a look at SystemC manage/have a look at is a magnificent construct that makes it possible for connection of indicators across the hierarchy of a SystemC IP block to another signal across the hierarchy of one other IP block written in SystemVerilog or HDL. it may possibly even be used on pre-compiled SystemVerilog and HDL IP blocks, however the SystemC IP block the place SystemC handle/have a look at constructs are used ought to have source-code visibility. This formula can not be used on compiled IP blocks. Secondly, it requires the entire hierarchical path of the supply and destination objects, expanding the complexity. additionally, due to the fact this system creates a jumper to connect both signals throughout IP blocks, specialization and parameterization of IP blocks is not feasible when this system is used. All these elements and its requirement for a non-compiled SystemC IP block a bit of hinder the usability of this otherwise valuable assemble. example:Clock Generator IP Blockmodule clockgen # (parameter duration = 5) (input output clk);…endprogram using SC manage/observe to connect Clock inner SystemC Stimulus Generatorclk.observe_foriegn_signal(“/clkgeninst/clk”); D. SystemC Verification connect SCV-connect is the ordinary version of SystemC control/have a look at for IP blocks that consist of the SystemC Verification Library. It is not as optimized because the SystemC handle/take a look at formulation and requires the SystemC Verification library to be included within the IP. example:Clock Generator IP Blockmodule clockgen #(parameter length = 5) (input output clk);…endprogram the use of SCV_Connect to connect Clock inside SystemC Stimulus Generatorscv_connect(clk, “/clkgeninst/clk”, SCV_INPUT); E. SC-DPIThe SystemC Direct Programming Interface (SC-DPI) formula provides an interface between SystemVerilog and SystemC that allows inter-language feature calls. This skill a SystemVerilog IP can call a characteristic described in a SystemC IP, and vice versa. it is a quick and proper method of connecting SystemVerilog IP blocks with SystemC IP blocks that have their exterior interfaces described in the sort of strategies handiest. illustration:SystemC Stimulus Generatorsc_module (sc_stimgen) …return_status gen_stim(void);…; Importing the SystemC components ‘gen_stim’ in SystemVerilog:import "SC-DPI" feature return_status gen_stim(); summary of assessment between different tactics The table [1] under gives comparison between distinctive tactics for making mixed-language connections. numerous vital features, corresponding to utilization eventualities, performance implications of the usage of one versus the other, delta cycle value update concerns, and so on. are listed for comparison. desk [1]: summary of comparison between different techniques III. METHODOLOGY FOR blended LANGUAGE IP INTEGRATION This area presents a three-step methodical method that helps clients opt for the optimum choice for integrating two IP blocks in a blended-language ambiance. STEP 1: understanding the IP BlocksAs the 1st step towards determining which method to use, designers should still: determine the design languages of IPs determine the supply of supply code of IPs on the end of this stage the designer could have a transparent realizing of the two IPs which are to be related. STEP 2: realizing the ConnectionsAfter gathering information about the two IP blocks, designers should additional: Analyze and record down the connections that are required to hook-up the two IP blocks together. All connections may also be largely divided into four classes. category AAll connections are confined to one, and just one, design-unit in the two IP’s, respectively. for example: IP BLOCK 1 IP BLOCK 2Clk ClockReset ResetData records class BAll connections are limited to at least one, and only 1, design unit in a single IP block however are dispensed throughout the hierarchies spanning through numerous design contraptions in the different IP block. for example: IP BLOCK 1 IP BLOCK 2Clk top.axicore1.clkReset properly.axicore2.resetData records category name connections are disbursed across the hierarchies spanning via distinct design devices in each the IP blocks. as an example: IP BLOCK 1 IP BLOCK 2top.axistimgen.clk appropriate.axicore1.clktop.axistimgen.reset excellent.axicore2.resetData facts class DAll connections are through components ports most effective. STEP 3: Finalizing the MethodThis is the most important step of the proposed methodology where the designers will zero-in on the optimal components to connect the two IP blocks. This step goes through a assessment of accessible strategies, removing of strategies, and mixing components routines to arrive at an optimized approach. elimination: because the first step, designers should dispose of the selections which can not be used at all to connect their two IP’s collectively, in simple terms on the basis of the character of the IP’s or the connections required. the following table can also be used for this elimination process: table [2]: removal process for premier system selection Mixing strategies: There could be cases where removal results in removal of all of the obtainable decisions. In such situations, designers will must use more than one formula to connect their IP blocks. occasionally mixing methods can also cause more optimized connections than following one single formulation. assessment of choices: After the removing and mixing methods steps, designers might be left with one or greater choices. they can then use particulars supplied in table [1], section II (how to connect mixed Language IP Blocks) to opt for the ultimate method for his or her SoC. IV. PROPOSED blended LANGUAGE INTER connect UTILITY The methodology introduced during this paper is used to increase a mixed language Inter join Utility (ICU) that takes both IP blocks written in distinct languages as enter and automates the hook-up connection technique by way of suggesting essentially the most correct approach, whereas taking the minimum enter from the consumer. It additionally generates snippets of code that may also be instantly inserted in the design to make these connections seamless and less vulnerable to blunders that may end up from manual updates. fashion designer Configuration File A clothier Configuration File (DCF) can be offered with the utility to automate it even extra. This designer configuration file (DCF) could have tips concerning the two regions to be related, port-maps of the two areas, identify of the output generated, and so forth. figure [1] depicts Inter connect Utility Step 1; parsing and picking out the design figure [1]: photo of ICU Step1 on the conclusion of the ICU run, an alternative should be offered to store the DCF containing all the settings that had been gathered or requested from the user during this run. The stored DCF can even be edited by the user to make small alterations in his bindings as per the requirement for subsequent ICU runs. Snapshots of Inter connect Utility beneath display the Step 2 and Step3 system (described in part III) of analyzing and making IP connections. determine [2]: photograph of ICU Step2 figure [3]: picture of ICU Step3 V. the usage of THE blended LANGUAGE INTERCONNECT UTILITY ON real WORLD DESIGN initial outcomes on a small design point out time savings in evaluation to manual integration effort, with the additional improvement of getting rid of the dependency on person’s knowhow of quite a few integration methods through instantly examining and proposing the most desirable option. VI. CONCLUSION The step by step methodology offered during this paper eliminates the limiting factor of IP reuse due to the complexity of mixed language designs. The leading merits of the proposed methodology are twofold: getting rid of the simple subject with “a way to” interconnect mixed-language IP’s through analyzing a couple of standardized/non-standardized methods and proposing the superior alternative with the highest advantage and minimal chance. enhancing the productivity with the aid of minimizing issues found late right through the design cycle because of incorrect interconnect strategy or manual error in IP integration. The proposed utility selects and automates many of the method of mixed language IP hook-up connection. It also offers flexibility to the user to opt for his option of components. REFERENCES [1] Rudra Mukherjee and Sachin Kakkar, “equipment Verilog – VHDL blended Design Reuse Methodology”, DVCon 2006. [2] Rajeev Ranjan, Homayoon Akhiani, et al. “against Harnessing the actual talents of IP Reuse”, DesignCon 2009 [3] Rudra Mukherjee, Gaurav Kumar Verma, Arnab Saha, "SystemC mixed-HDL IP Reuse Methodology", IP-07 [4] Gaurav Kumar Verma & Rudra Mukherjee, “SystemVerilog-VHDL-SystemC Verification IP Reuse Methodology”, IP-08 important notice The utility introduced during this paper is a standalone tool to support users automate connecting their blended-language IP’s. As of nowadays, there are no plans to add this utility in Questa author BIOGRAPHY Pankaj Singh completed his Bachelors in Electronics from REC Bhopal in 1993; grasp’s in Electrical Engineering from USF, Florida in 1997 and MBA from SMU, Dallas in 2001. He has 16 years of industry journey which contains work with Texas contraptions, ST Microelectronics and Infineon technologies. Pankaj has published 12+ technical papers in a lot of foreign conferences. during the past he has labored in a considerable number of design management roles comparable to IP building manager, Full chip SoC Design supervisor, and Design move branch head.at present he’s working with Infineon India as Senior supervisor with center of attention on gadget, useful Verification and application Infrastructure actions and may be reached at pankaj(dot)singh(at)infineon.com Gaurav Kumar Verma completed his Bachelors in Electrical Engineering from Indian Institute of technology Delhi in 2003. He has more than 6+ years of journey within the EDA trade, specializing in insurance-pushed verification and mixed-language simulation methodologies. He has a few technical papers and articles in a lot of overseas conferences and business main publications.currently he’s working with Mentor snap shots as a Member of Consulting personnel and can be reached at gaurav-kumar_verma(at)mentor.com Index terms SC-DPI : SC Direct Programming Interface SCV : SystemC Verification DCF : designer Configuration File ICU : Inter join Utility despite massive Democratic fundraise, Graham quite simply wins SC Return to homepage × you’ve got been selected for this particular subscription present. ‘; else var sFallBack = ‘click here to subscribe’; $(‘#lee-functions-list .loading’).disguise(); $(‘#lee-features-list’).html(‘ ‘+sFallBack+’ ‘); $(‘.lee-featured-subscription’).html(sFallBack); characteristic lee_formatPackage(oService) are attempting var bOnlyModal = authentic; var oSettings = lee_getPackageSettings(oService.HomeMembership); var newService = ; if(parseInt(oService.WebFeatureFG) === 2) return false; if(oService.WebStartPrice != ”) var custom = JSON.parse(oService.WebStartPrice); $.every(customized, feature(okay,v) newService[k] = v; ); if(bOnlyModal && newService.in_modal && newService.in_modal.toLowerCase() === ‘false’) return false; if(!bOnlyModal && newService.not_members && newService.not_members.toLowerCase() === ‘true’) return false; newService.has_featured_class = newService.featured ? ‘featured-equipment’ : ”; newService.kind = parseInt((newService.variety) ? newService.form : oSettings.type); newService.title = (newService.package_title && newService.package_title != ”) ? newService.package_title : oSettings.title; newService.stage = oService.HomeMembership; newService.html = oService.WebOfferHTML; newService.disabled = newService.disable_purchase ? ‘disabled’ : ”; var rate = lee_formatPackagePrice(newService.start_price); newService.start_price = expense.charge; newService.format_dollars = (fee.format_dollars) ? expense.format_dollars : ”; newService.format_cents = (price.format_cents) ? expense.format_cents : ”; newService.start_at_rate = (newService.fixed_rate === ‘real’) ? ‘for the low cost of’ : ‘beginning at’; if( !newService.term ) newService.term = ‘per month’; newService.has_promotion_class = ”; if( newService.promotional_price && newService.promotional_price != ” ) newService.has_promotion_class = ‘has-advertising’; var advertising = lee_formatPackagePrice(newService.promotional_price); newService.promotional_price = promotion.can charge; newService.promotional_format_dollars = (advertising.format_dollars) ? merchandising.format_dollars : ”; newService.promotional_format_cents = (merchandising.format_cents) ? advertising.format_cents : ”; newService.special_title_class = newService.special_title ? ‘has-particular-title’ : ”; newService.special_label_class = newService.label ? ‘has-label’ : ”; newService.action_button = ‘sign up’; if(newService.disabled === ‘disabled’) newService.start_at_rate = ‘name us at’; newService.start_price = ‘314-340-8000’; newService.term = ‘to get all started’; newService.action_button = ‘call nowadays’; window.lee_service_impressions.push( ‘id’: newService.degree, ‘name’: newService.title, ‘fee’: newService.start_price, ‘manufacturer’: "stltoday.com", ‘class’: ‘subscription’, ‘record’: ‘Block’, ‘place’: newService.style ); return newService; trap(e) if(window.console) console.warn(e); return false; feature lee_sortPackages(property) var sortOrder = 1; if(property[0] === "-") sortOrder = -1; property = property.substr(1); return function (a,b) var outcomes = (a[property] b[property]) ? 1 : 0; return outcome * sortOrder; characteristic lee_getPackageSettings(sPackage) change(sPackage.toLowerCase()) case ‘dob’: return title: ‘Digital basic’, variety: 0; ruin; case ‘dop’: return title: ‘Digital Plus’, model: 1; break; case ‘dopl’: return title: ‘Digital Platinum’, variety: 2; spoil; case ‘silv’: return title: ‘Silver’, type: three; smash; case ‘gold’: return title: ‘Gold’, variety: 4; destroy; case ‘plat’: return title: ‘Platinum’, model: 5; wreck; characteristic lee_replacePackageTokens(sPackage, oService, sCol) var hasPromotion = false; $.each and every(oService, function(okay,v) if( okay === ‘html’) v = v.exchange(new RegExp(‘domain’, ‘gi’), ‘stltoday.com’) .replace(new RegExp(‘site_name’, ‘gi’), ‘STLtoday.com’) .exchange(new RegExp(‘business_name’, ‘gi’), ‘STLtoday.com’) .replace(new RegExp(‘site_phone’, ‘gi’), ‘314-340-8000’); sPackage = sPackage.change(new RegExp(”+okay+”, ‘gi’), v); ); if(sCol) sPackage = sPackage.exchange(‘col’, sCol); return sPackage; are trying var oPackages = [], oFeatured = false, sHtml = ”, sTemplate = $(‘#lee-provider-template’).html(); $.each(window.leeMembershipPackages, function(i, oService) var oService = lee_formatPackage(oService); if(oService) oPackages.push(oService); if(oService.featured === ‘genuine’) oFeatured = oService; ); if(oPackages.length === 0) throw ‘No packages described’; oPackages.style(lee_sortPackages(‘type’)); if(!oFeatured) oFeatured = oPackages[0]; if(oPackages.length === 1) sTemplate = $(‘#lee-provider-template-single’).html(); $(‘#lee-services-checklist’).addClass(‘single’); else $(‘#lee-functions-record’).addClass(‘distinctive’); switch(oPackages.size) case 6: var sCol = ‘2’; destroy; case 5: var sCol = ‘5ths’; wreck; case 4: var sCol = ‘three’; ruin; case three: var sCol = ‘4’; smash; case 2: var sCol = ‘6’; wreck; default: var sCol = ’12’; wreck; $(‘#lee-services-modal’).addClass(‘packages_’+oPackages.size); $.each and every(oPackages, function(i, oService) sHtml += lee_replacePackageTokens(sTemplate, oService, sCol); ); $(‘#lee-services-checklist .applications’).html(sHtml).promise().then(function() $(‘#lee-capabilities-checklist .loading’).conceal(); $(‘#lee-capabilities-checklist .packages’).css(‘opacity’, 1); ); if(!__tnt.user.features) if( $(‘.lee-featured-subscription’).length > 0 && oFeatured ) $(‘.lee-featured-subscription’).each(function() var html = $(this).html(); if( !oFeatured.featured_button_text ) if(oFeatured.promotional_price) oFeatured.featured_button_text = oFeatured.promotional_format_dollars+oFeatured.promotional_price+oFeatured.promotional_format_cents+’ ‘+oFeatured.term; else oFeatured.featured_button_text = ‘be part of for ‘+oFeatured.format_dollars+oFeatured.start_price+oFeatured.format_cents+’ ‘+oFeatured.time period; html = lee_replacePackageTokens(html, oFeatured); $(this).html(html); if(oFeatured.promotional_price) $(this).addClass(‘has-promotiom’); if( $(this).hasClass(‘display-after-loaded’) ) $(this).display(); ); seize (e) if(window.console) console.warn(e); lee_serviceError(); window.lee_fetched_services = proper; ); AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) CEO Aengus Kelly on Q3 2020 outcomes – profits call Transcript To make sure this doesn’t ensue in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies on your browser.is that this happening to you frequently? Please file it on our feedback forum. if in case you have an ad-blocker enabled you can be blocked from continuing. Please disable your advert-blocker and refresh. Reference id:.

tags: , , , ,