October 22, 2020
Lds Meeting Agenda Template Best Of Participant Agenda Icon Agenda Free Transparent Png756975ugag

Lds Meeting Agenda Template

Lds Meeting Agenda Template- discografia de bob marley bob marley meeting program template sample corporate minutes cub scout cub pack 61 event planning guide annual program planning lds family blog presidency meeting agenda life s journey to perfection young women class presidency family meeting rules worksheets vale s a 2020 foreign issuer report 6 k life s journey to perfection 2015 lds primary ideas i know sacrament meeting program lds for android apk download
Standing Order Template
order confirmation template 20 free word excel pdf document, source:zieag.neoddns.org
e30f cd3fc80d69ce67eb44e35
Meeting Minutes Worksheet, source:indymoves.org
page 4
Bible Scriptures To Open A Meeting PDF Free Download, source:docplayer.net
77f3f89b5c1331a2d c7a4f34
Sacrament Meeting Template 2 JPEG, source:pinterest.com
Relief Society Presidency Meeting Agenda Printable
Printable Relief Society Presidency Meeting Agenda, source:littleldsideas.net
April At Home Primary Talk Name 791x1024
Primary Talks for Church At Home April 2020 so she, source:oneshetwoshe.com
a807d fa7bc8cfcacfa0e77d53ba lds primary primary president lds
Sample Sacrament Meeting Agenda New Sample a, source:newsamplea.blogspot.com

valence electron lesson plan Covalent Bond, source:scribd.com
18 The Best Lds Church Meeting Agenda Template Download by Lds Church Meeting Agenda Template
18 The Best Lds Church Meeting Agenda Template Download by, source:legaldbol.com

Sample Example & Format Templates Free Excel, Doc, PDF, xls lds bishopric meeting agenda template lds church meeting agenda template lds meeting agenda template 18 the best lds church meeting agenda template download by sacrament meeting template 2 jpeg meeting minutes worksheet printable relief society presidency meeting agenda order confirmation template 20 free word excel pdf document bible scriptures to open a meeting pdf free download primary talks for church at home april 2020 so she sample sacrament meeting agenda new sample a valence electron lesson plan covalent bond related image

Debunked: Republican’s ’32 Franken Ballots in a motor vehicle’ Story is comprehensive Nonsense, never happened
READER comments ON"Debunked: Republican’s ’32 Franken Ballots in a automobile’ Story is finished Nonsense, not ever happened"(27 Responses to this point…) remark #1 [Permalink] …

David Brauer

talked about on eleven/13/2008 @ 7:fifty eight pm PT…

hello Brad – thanks for the linkage and getting the observe out. One small correction – I write for MinnPost.com. however we’re determined in Minneapolis, I feel we’re taking pictures for all of Minnesota with our name. So or not it’s now not the Minneapolis put up. Small, small factor, nevertheless it helps with those Google searches. surest,David [ed note: Thanks, David. I fixed it in Brad’s post for you. Sorry. –99] remark #2 [Permalink] …

huge Dan

said on 11/13/2008 @ 9:33 pm PT…

Al Franken wants a lawsuit to seem to be into the absentee ballots that weren’t counted, but Coleman-R’s campaign supervisor wants to "aid" these absentee voters who’s votes weren’t counted…by using now not counting them! he is "assisting" them: "Coleman campaign manager Cullen Sheehan referred to the court should still reject the lawsuit to offer protection to the privateness of voters and to hold invalid ballots from influencing the influence. http://hosted.ap.org/dyn…OME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT comment #3 [Permalink] …

huge Dan

pointed out on 11/13/2008 @ 9:forty one pm PT…

He does not need their votes to count to "give protection to them"! he’s on their aspect! remark #four [Permalink] …

TEDEGER
noted on 11/13/2008 @ 9:58 pm PT…

individually, for what it is worth, the State that selected Wellstone would be some distance better represented by Franken than Coleman. The GOP is out to steal one more, with the aid of ANY skill feasible, and have to be brought up brief. a decent count number is what is needed, and if it’s Coleman – well, after all, MN DID select Ventura Governor! comment #5 [Permalink] …

karen
said on 11/13/2008 @ 10:15 pm PT…

To Brad, Heller, and Bauer: Thanks for some investigative reporting on this,what a novel conception, a person truly picked up the mobile and talked to a person, and obtained a true story. So the MN Sec of State pollstuffing alleged via Fox definitely consisted of: double-sealed ballots whose whereabouts were at all times familiar and had been no longer faraway from city hall more than 1 hour, that ended up netting Franken 9 votes, in line with voting precentages in Mpls!? Boy with examples like that of Election Fraud, how will we go on, definitely our election system cannot be this dangerous!? how can i go on trusting our Democracy?! based on this, it is evident the best approach Dems ever got handle of our Congress and Exec department changed into by way of stealing it, i will be able to conclude nothing else! And our two native print day by day newspapers haven’t even de-bunked this Fox/WSJ edition of this national story through doing what Bauer did, determining up the cell and speakme to the attention-witnesses. Heaven forbid they take the extra step of interviewing one of the most Republican and Indepent poll-laborers invovled in transporting these ballots election evening as credible witnesses about what came about election nighttime. just feel of all of the crazy stuff we now have seen in elections over the remaining 8 years, and at last election integrity makes it on Fox information over: paper ballots that may really be visibly secured, accompanied and counting in entrance of witnesses, ballots that were dealt with in a prison manner consistent with State legislations, had been tracked in correct chain-of-custody, have been handiest unsecured in the vehicles for under one hour, were double-sealed and best opened when counted, and as soon as counted, the results of the counting yielding 18 votes for Franken, 7 for Coleman and the relaxation for other candidates or none, absolutely in step with voting patterns in that district matched, so netting a whopping complete 9 votes for the Dem candidate – its pretty rattling humorous here’s most Fox information can discover to rag on the MN rigging of the election, funny if it wasn’t so sad and hypocritical. something that also seems value exploring, the Coleman lawsuit to stop the counting of those filed last Saturday turned into, I believed, filed in Ramsey County, a wierd jurisdiction to sue given the ballots in query have been from Mpls precincts, which is in Hennepin County. Of route the suit became brushed aside on the foundation of no standing. So the legal motion gave the look of it changed into purposefully doomed for failure but allowed them to mis-state the story of those ballots and create a demonstrate via going to courtroom to cease the count number rather than really attempting actual legal action to comfortable the vote counting. in my view as MN resident, i would perfer that the State require the ballots be stored and transported in hardened packing containers like tough plastic packing containers or metal packing containers with tamper-proof seals, so when they are being stored upon arrival in the mail and when they are pushed to precints, they’re a whole lot less prone to be tampered with. A one time investment in such pollboxes (might be four hundred-500 crucial in every of the larger counties) and the small cost of tamper-proof seals for each election appear to be tremendous cheap approach to enhanced insure the integrity of our elections. however in fact, Fox, here’s all you got, here’s the gold standard that your country wide org can get a hold of on the MN election, re-freakin-diculous. Brad, make sure to point this out to the Fox newsy that interviewed you earlier than the election and gave the impression so proud they had been being fair and balanced. possibly you could goad her into investigating the Alaska, just like the reminiscence playing cards that showed facts of being modified just before they have been released to a FOIA request. remark #6 [Permalink] …

Phil

referred to on 11/14/2008 @ 12:34 am PT…

I might as smartly pile it on "The Journal." i really like how the WSJ’s remarks pages demand you use a real identify, whereas their personal moderator makes use of an acronym e.g. "WSJonline" i’d ought to say the way it’s setup is "propaganda generator mode." i attempted to comment i used to be greeted with a message that the subject matter was now locked. How convenient. Print lies, and switch off feedback. Neat, no ask yourself there’s no oversight of the economy. comment #7 [Permalink] …

Perry Logan

stated on eleven/14/2008 @ 3:forty five am PT…

it’s unbelievable how the Republicans are becoming interested in election fraud, now that or not it’s stopped working for them. I cannot agree with they are dumb adequate to deliver it up, even though. comment #8 [Permalink] …

molly
spoke of on 11/14/2008 @ 4:33 am PT…

Repubs. are combating hard for these three senate seats aren’t they? considering the fraud has been going on for therefore lengthy…. further and further of US be aware of that our election system is damaged. hard to tug off the propaganda. Esp. in Alaska the place the ’04 election was stolen in such a clumsy vogue the records might on no account be became over to the general public.Now Alaska is being brazenly mocked…that has to harm. possibly the old militia maneuver "don’t shoot ’till you see the whites of their eyes" is working. comment #9 [Permalink] …

rollotomasi
mentioned on eleven/14/2008 @ 5:28 am PT…

abnormal how the Republicans are focusing on Minnesota, not Alaska, which seems to have a long way improved election manage problems. Hmmm, wonder why it is. comment #10 [Permalink] …

lolwat
observed on 11/14/2008 @ 9:50 am PT…

or not it’s brilliant how bias this story is. additionally liberals a nutjobs and should probably steal this senate seat remark #11 [Permalink] …

SandyD
spoke of on eleven/14/2008 @ 10:fifty three am PT…

LOLWAT: Did you develop up in a Republican city that refused to spend ample funds for education? You appear incapable of accurately writing two essential declarative sentences. comment #12 [Permalink] …

Chris Hooten@work
spoke of on 11/14/2008 @ 10:55 am PT…

Pardon me, LOLWAT, however changed into that English? most effective stupid americans don’t truth examine FOX news. they have got been proven to be deceptive and/or lying time and again, and without retractions, even when proven wrong. an awful lot of right-wing radio has the identical difficulty. reviews have proven that the least informed, and most misinformed people are the ones that get their information from right-wing speak radio. (be aware Limbaugh recently tried to call the current recession an "Obama recession," and tried responsible it on him, which is absolutely ridiculous, as are assertions of him chumming it up with terrorists, or being a Marxist, socialist, or communist) Of route, if a person on no account fact checks the usage of distinct respectable sources, they would by no means comprehend that, would they? in any case, it sounds good, it have to be actual. The leisure of the media does not have a "liberal" bias, but a "actuality" bias which runs against the grain of the mis-informing right-wing media outlets. I guess to sum it all up, you are completely incorrect, LOLWAT, about who, exactly, are the nutjobs. comment #13 [Permalink] …

Floridiot

talked about on 11/14/2008 @ eleven:22 am PT…

Take it easy on him, it’s hard sufficient for him to category with one finger in his nose and slippery keys from all the drool comment #14 [Permalink] …

Soul rebel
talked about on eleven/14/2008 @ 11:forty seven am PT…

LOLWAT even misspelled his own identify. it’s going to have been LO-WATT. Man, these guys make it too handy from time to time. remark #15 [Permalink] …

David Anderer
talked about on 11/14/2008 @ 12:04 pm PT…

so far as who is stealing votes, Rove says the Barack Obama victory became just a bit more suitable than "W". No massive deal he says. approach over exaggerated he says. The Republicans put a lot of time, funds and energy into voter suppression in every single place the United States, we be aware of it really is a reality. If all those who were legally allowed to vote and had been stopped by way of the Republicans who were in a position to vote what would the whole had been in a good and free election? My hypothesis on here’s the follows. We know they work with small percentages from distinct websites and states believing that the election could be shut and that 5 or 10% suppression will cowl their deficit within the vote casting sales space. I feel it not unattainable that in a good and honest election Obama would have won by 16,000,000 votes. Brad can you look into to that opportunity and shut up Rove and all those who somehow trust their propaganda? remark #16 [Permalink] …

GWN
said on eleven/14/2008 @ eight:31 pm PT…

David @ 15 TruthIsAll who every now and then comments right here, also feels Obama likely received through a lots higher margin.TruthIsAll remark #17 [Permalink] …

walk Softly
observed on eleven/15/2008 @ 7:01 am PT…

in response to Brauer’s article, or is that this an opinion piece: adequate, so were the ballots ever in a automobile? sure. however stow the outrage except you hear the particulars. Stow the outrage. Umm say what. The actual story is even more outrage-frightening. And it all needs extra investigation, now not editorializing there may be much ado about nothing. A precinct shut down earlier than the prison closing time? become the judge in that precinct tallying paper ballots earlier than the polls closed? isn’t that disenfranchisement? Federal law requires polls to be open except the state’s required shut of polls. This retaining the polls open except each closing voter who arrived on time, or become in line at the time of close of polls – changed into so neatly wide-spread nationwide as a result of every person everywhere in each state expected some 70% to 80% voter turnout, no remember the tiny or tremendous district. Yet, some polls in Minnesota closed earlier than the publicly introduced shut of polls cut-off date including one the place it simply so took place armed forces (based on the story) absentees had no longer yet made it to the precinct by using 7:30 pm, and had been within minutes of being brought to the polling site? What doesn’t odor about that Mr. Brauer? should still anyone have are available in a couple of minutes earlier than closing time and be standing in line, or the only one, no longer standing in a line, that adult or persons are enabled to vote on the precinct. This could even encompass someone who had doubtlessly submitted a non-defense force absentee ballot. One presumes the militia absentees might arrive even after the election day closing date as a result of these are definitely beneath ‘federal’ jurisdiction and are given a couple of day leeway provided that they are postmarked with the relevant deadline date. At any price, probably a voter wasn’t certain the absentee pollmade it on time and that they have been lower back within the precinct. Most states have legal guidelines requiring the voter if so demonstrate up on the polls, void the absentee, and vote in the precinct. but this polling region closed early? the place in the world are the election integrity americans on the disenfranchisement issue right here? The story needs additional investigation. Who challenges absentee pollelectors? election officials? no longer in different states, political birthday celebration pollwatchers on the precinct have that privilege. the place are the election integrity americans on the problem election officers can challenge the absentees? not one of the story sounds appropriate if absentee paper ballots didn’t make it to the precinct for whatever thing motive. it be now not like judges and drivers don’t have mobile phone communique. hi there we’re operating a bit late for our beginning of your extra absentee ballots. hello, we’re correct outdoor the door and notice you’ve gotten closed the doors, open up so that you can convey these. So what the ballots weren’t truly within the decide’s car, having under no circumstances arrived on the precinct. They were certainly in somebody’s vehicle for some period of time. doubtlessly ample time for anything else to ensue. All because the ballot closed down early? Judges of election can close a ballot down early as a result of no one is coming in the final hour for vote casting? Ridiculous. wants investigated, no longer swept away as a rumor. Brauer should still additionally assessment particulars of this observation as reality: city hall workforce checks the outer envelope to guarantee registration validity. If these are militia absentees and residents residing abroad, and any one of them were with-held as being valid voters, or suitable postmarking, and so forth. someone more desirable examine how those had been dealt with. the place are the election integrity americans on that one? greater knowledge disenfranchisement by means of election officers who’re jury and judge all outside the view of the public. For shame. [ed note: Blockquote inserted for clarity. I’ve read the piece two times now, and I don’t see where it says a polling place closed early. –99] remark #18 [Permalink] …

Lora
referred to on 11/15/2008 @ 12:38 pm PT…

stroll Softly (#17), I have no idea the place your allegations come from, but I can not find them in Brauer’s article linked above. I cannot find anywhere that claims that any of the precincts had been closed "sooner than the prison closing time." From the article (emphasis mine): using the ballotsThe drivers went out about 7:30 p.m. Reichert soon heard from some who were concerned they might not get to each precinct before closing. as soon as a precinct decide gets rid of a tallying machine memory card, votes can not be counted there. Reichert says she despatched a broadcast message to every precinct’s lead choose to retain websites open, however now not every person obtained it. Some much less-busy sites shut down before the drivers obtained there . Nowhere does it say that the precincts shut down before the prison closing time. walk Softly writes: not one of the story sounds correct if absentee paper ballots didn’t make it to the precinct for whatever thing cause. it’s not like judges and drivers do not have mobile phone communication. good day we’re operating just a little late for our beginning of your additional absentee ballots. hello, we’re appropriate backyard the door and see you have got closed the doorways, open up if you want to carry these. As you could see, the message to hold the precincts open DID exit: Reichert says she despatched a broadcast message to each precinct’s lead judge to keep websites open, however not every person received it. There is not any proof that any of the precincts closed early. An option and entirely believable rationalization is that some precincts closed on time, and others closed later. stroll Softly writes: If these are military absentees and residents living overseas, and anybody of them have been with-held as being valid voters, or suitable postmarking, and so on. somebody more desirable examine how those have been handled. where are the election integrity people on that one? more skills disenfranchisement by way of election officers who’re jury and judge all outside the view of the public. From the article: in the end, Franken claimed 18 of the 32 votes and Coleman got seven. The leisure had been non-votes or for other candidates. I don’t see any facts whatever that any of the absentee ballot voters were disenfranchised. No point out of any postmarks or registrations being amiss. here is a non-subject in this case. "For shame." yes, it’s a disgrace to make unfounded allegations. comment #19 [Permalink] …

truthisall

talked about on eleven/15/2008 @ 7:38 pm PT…

remark #20 [Permalink] …

truthisall

said on 11/15/2008 @ 7:forty pm PT…

comment #21 [Permalink] …

truthisall

spoke of on eleven/15/2008 @ 7:45 pm PT…

2008 Landslide Denied: Uncounted Votes and the final national Exit ballot TruthIsAll Nov. 12, 2008 http://www.geocities.com…nmodel/Uncounted2008.htm With basically 100% of precincts reporting, the latest election consequences demonstrate Obama main via 8.4m votes with a complete of 126.5m recorded. That’s a superior mandate, however his true Vote changed into improved than that. The enormous GOTV and new registration effort has no longer resulted in the anticipated enhance in the recorded vote from 2004. bear in mind the 17m net raise from 2000 to 2004 (105m to 122m)? The media should be asking the questions. Why is the recorded count number at 126.5m, when a 140m+ turnout became forecast? what number of voters had been informed they had to comprehensive provisional ballots? [ed note: Please read our commenting rules. –99] remark #22 [Permalink] …

stroll Softly
talked about on 11/16/2008 @ 10:27 am PT…

LoraYour feedback are welcome. My feedback were designed to attract some response from this gang as a result of Brauer’s article seems no longer to have drawn outrage to itself as it should still have. simply as Brad’s headline and feedback are designed for a specific goal and clearly just as Brauer’s piece is designed to disregard ‘outrage’ as unjustified, my feedback have been designed to get somebody to examine all of what is being written. It seems to me that any one analyzing Brauer’s piece, anyone who is really attracted to election integrity would not stand for being advised to stow the outrage. The article does not naturally specify whether the polls (those being ones which were to receive absentees) closed down early, precisely on time, or later than the felony closing time. That info is not particular. [ed note: And needn’t be. If you feel so strongly about this, poll the poll workers and write your own article. –99] here’s precisely what made me consider to include this kind of cost of closing down before the legal time. Reichert says she despatched a broadcast message to every precinct’s lead decide to hold websites open, but not everyone received it. Some much less-busy websites shut down before the drivers acquired there. [ed note: Pretty obvious she meant she sent a mass email or text message to all the polling sites, asking that they not leave until the drivers got there… which has nothing to do with a polling place closing early or late. They would close on time. She wanted the poll workers to stay to receive the drivers. –99]From that, we don’t know what sites had been less busy and had shut down before the drivers bought there. We have no idea no matter if much less busy sites may have closed down somewhat earlier than closing time. From the article we just do not know what a comment about less-busy websites ability. [ed note: The article does not assume such crazy things, and so wouldn’t report them. –99] What does a much less busy web site have to do with a prescheduled prison closing of polls time? Nothing. so this is what led me to feel a couple of precinct possibly beginning the shut down procedure early. now not anticipating any absentees, or no longer being apprised some hours before such could be arriving, a precinct may also begin the system of closing down five and even a couple of minutes earlier and that’s quite simply now not out of the realm of opportunity. but we don’t know, because the reporter didn’t demonstrate anything precisely satisfactory to have that abilities pushed aside as out of hand. once again, the time period less-busy become used by way of an respectable and that prompted the conjecture. there is so a lot we are not made privy to by way of the piece and that is why the reporter’s tips for us to stow the outrage is an outrage in itself. The article also does not state precisely what number of precincts had been to be contacted to anticipate delivery of some element of 32 defense force/overseas ballots. no person has clarified what number of precincts were ones where some quantity of the 32 ballots had been to be delivered. thus we don’t know from the article how many were to be notified through a broadcast to remain open. absolutely now not an amount improved than 32. how many, 6? 10? 15? 4? The author does say 4 ballots made it to precinct/s but doesn’t say if these four ballots have been brought to one precinct or four precincts or two precincts each and every receiving 2 ballots, or anything greater about them aside from they had been "unintentionally uncounted" that evening. based on the reporter’s personal words, the reporter acknowledges the 32 absentees have been in some officials’ vehicle/s – those being "Precinct assist choose/s." lots of particulars don’t seem to be specified. How was the message to retain polls open broadcast? Broadcast capacity whatever diverse than mobilephone calls have been tried to be made. does not broadcast imply radio verbal exchange? had been two-manner radios supplied and have been they in working order or not? [ed note:broadcast |ˈbrôdˌkast|verb ( past -cast or -casted ; past part. -cast or -casted) [ trans. ]1 (commonly be broadcast) transmit (a software or some information) with the aid of radio or tv : the announcement became broadcast are living | [as n. ] ( broadcasting) the 1920s saw the dawn of broadcasting.• [ intrans. ] take half in a radio or tv transmission : the station broadcasts 24 hours a day.• inform (whatever thing) to many individuals; make extensively conventional : we do not need to broadcast our disappointment to the area.2 scatter (seeds) by way of hand or machine in place of inserting in drills or rows. See note at scatter . That appears pretty clear. –99] As as to whether any absentees have been disenfranchised. We have not been given any determine for a way many militia/overseas absentees could were disqualified earlier than the 32 absentees (ok’d to be processed on the precinct stage according to election legislation) had been despatched out for birth to the precincts. You certainly haven’t any groundwork to claim this:I do not see any facts anything that any of the absentee ballot voters had been disenfranchised. No mention of any postmarks or registrations being amiss. here is a non-situation during this case. simply since the reporter didn’t point out or state such doesn’t suggest there is no facts for such. this is the aspect of what I wrote, to get all to rethink being instructed to "stow the outrage." perhaps i’m being provocative as well to be aware I don’t see a Lora response to any however my post at this aspect and so I note you’re calling me out on what I wrote, however not questioning the inability of tips in the article and equivalent lack of suggestions and curiosity via Bradblog. there may be still chance for such all around so i may make no definitive preconceived judgement. [ed note: No. You are being obtuse and demanding we pay for it. Lora can respond to other commenters as the whim strikes her. Please read my comment below about our position on posting knowing disinformation. –99] comment #23 [Permalink] …

stroll Softly
referred to on eleven/sixteen/2008 @ 11:06 am PT…

Truthisall,The reason behind the disparity in projected turnout may be because of inflated and bloated precinct/county/state voter registration databases which more often than no longer include names of deceased and electors who have modified address to an out of state one however now not notified the previous precinct of a residency alternate. comment #24 [Permalink] …

Agent 99

mentioned on eleven/sixteen/2008 @ 12:fifty seven pm PT…

walk Softly Your feedback might not be welcome if you play video games like that. people will study or not examine the cloth at links, based on their own whim, want, or allocation of time. Posting knowing disinformation will get you banned from Brad weblog. I, for one, resent being made to reread the article and to try to make feel out of your long comment, at all, but in fact even more when i’m pushed for time, but deserve to waste it on that stuff. then you had the nerve to conclusion it with "for shame"? you have got expressed your dissatisfaction with the article, and with our failure to be curious about aspects we understood and also you didn’t, at size. you can agree or disagree or discuss facets with individuals all you want, but posting disinformation, even in case you suppose or not it’s for an excellent trigger, is not only towards the guidelines, it be impolite and pernicious. Frankly, it appears extra to me as although you mistakenly notion you discovered something to pitch a fit about and pitched your fit, and as a substitute of just coming returned and asserting you have been sorry, that you just misinterpret, you made up an excuse so that you may keep it up picking at the piece and the commenters who respond to you. severely, you could be banned in case you do anything like that once more. remark #25 [Permalink] …

stroll Softly
referred to on eleven/16/2008 @ 1:53 pm PT…

Agent 99. What DISinformation have I given? My posting that some precincts may have closed down sooner than the prison closing time changed into speculation . My offense was showing that hypothesis was possible, it’s, some precincts may have closed early, based on as defined within the subsequent put up, officers use of the term "less-busy" precincts. or not it’s nonetheless a potential that some precincts closed early, these being less busy. would it not matter if some closed 5 minutes early? It may have mattered if that precinct got notice (broadcast) of absentees about to be delivered. it’s hypothesis from the contents of the article. We don’t know from anything else within the article especially either how a message was ‘broadcast’ to the affected precincts, nor can we understand what number of may still have had the absentees delivered. So my comments elevating questions are hypothesis now not disinformation. reminiscent of offering the possibility there have been aside from 32 armed forces/overseas absentee ballots and amongst those may have been disqualifications. I do not have in mind how the can charge can be brought that what I wrote changed into disinformation. possibly the vogue wasn’t sufficient, however I feel it an unfair can charge you may have made. comment #26 [Permalink] …

Lora
pointed out on 11/16/2008 @ 3:forty six pm PT…

pricey walk Softly, I trust Agent 99 changed into perfectly clear. in case you are in reality perplexed about what is disinformation and what’s speculation: to your first put up (remark # 17) you go on at length — a couple of sentences — about how incorrect it will be that some polls closed early. many of your "questions" read exactly like statements however for the question mark. There is not any facts that I’ve viewed that these polling places closed early — yet you go on and on about the hurt executed because they did query-mark. Nowhere did you say you were speculating as to what might have took place if the polls had closed early. you’re implying without any again-up that they did shut early and hurt that may had been achieved on account of it (disinformation). [Walk Softly:] You undoubtedly have no basis to claim this: [Lora:]I don’t see any evidence whatever thing that any of the absentee ballot voters were disenfranchised. No point out of any postmarks or registrations being amiss. this is a non-subject during this case. [Walk Softly:]just since the reporter didn’t mention or state such doesn’t suggest there is no facts for such. As I spoke of, I do not see any evidence for this. If there is any, consider free to quote and link. however if you go on at size about how poorly the validation of the ballots may also have been handled and imply that the election integrity folks are amiss for now not being on proper of that, once more you’re in the realm of making stuff up, not speculation. comment #27 [Permalink] …

Paul Allen
observed on eleven/18/2008 @ 11:27 pm PT…

.